.
presumed guilty
you raped me
you are lying
you raped me
liar
rape
lie
rape
liar
how can we know
the truth
in these words
...
she says - he raped me
he says - she lies
I did not rape her
the printed words
should have the same value
but
if you interpret a woman's word
differently than a man's word
then to you
they do not have the same value
or
if certain words contain
a horrific emotional value
such that you believe only a truthful
person would ever say them
then the speaker of those words
may be favored
...
if the words are spoken
in a court room
or on a televised interview
we can become confused
both testimonials
can contain the appearance of truth
how do we know
the truth
hiding behind the lies
how do we know
the lies
hiding behind the truth
...
we look for body language
little glances - that do not
harmonize with the spoken words
tone of voice - that does not
harmonize with the spoken words
we look for believability
that illusive perfume of believability
...
what of the liar
that looks believable
the liar that has - that
illusive perfume of believability
what of the truth sayer
who looks guilty
has no perfume of believability
...
do we consider evidence
evidence that contradicts
the perfume of believability
...
out with the evidence
evidence can be wrong
witnesses can lie
vote your belief
believe in your ability
to smell believability
...
but
the list is long
the list you smelled guilty
has been proven wrong
the guilty are innocent
and the innocent are guilty
and you go on
and on
to smell again
and again
.
Keith O'Connor
Ottawa Canada
2001 aug 25
www.tinmangallery.com
|